Hi everyone
Does anyone know of any case where compensation has been given by a local authority re the premature sale of a deceased relative's property for a period when that person was in residential care, prior to entering a nursing home, please?
Our claim concerns NHS continuing care for the later period in the nursing home but redress for other elements may need to be considered.
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman's 3rd Report Retrospective Continuing Care Funding and Redress' 2006-7, re the Deferred Payment Agreement which began in 2001, after the death of our relative, stated:
'some property will have been sold prior to the introduction of the scheme. There may be some instances where financial loss claimed is attributable to the actions, or inaction, of the Local Authority rather than the NHS'.
and
'I do not consider that payments for claimed financial loss should be made in the absence of clear evidence that denial of continuing care funding led to that loss. However it is clear that there should be appropriate recompense for demonstrated financial loss evidenced by the complainant. Not to do so would result in unremedied injustice.'
Does anyone know of any case where compensation has been given by a local authority re the premature sale of a deceased relative's property for a period when that person was in residential care, prior to entering a nursing home, please?
Our claim concerns NHS continuing care for the later period in the nursing home but redress for other elements may need to be considered.
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman's 3rd Report Retrospective Continuing Care Funding and Redress' 2006-7, re the Deferred Payment Agreement which began in 2001, after the death of our relative, stated:
'some property will have been sold prior to the introduction of the scheme. There may be some instances where financial loss claimed is attributable to the actions, or inaction, of the Local Authority rather than the NHS'.
and
'I do not consider that payments for claimed financial loss should be made in the absence of clear evidence that denial of continuing care funding led to that loss. However it is clear that there should be appropriate recompense for demonstrated financial loss evidenced by the complainant. Not to do so would result in unremedied injustice.'

